From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-194690-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16458 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2006 08:06:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 16305 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2006 08:06:34 -0000
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060823080634.16304.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-28807-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/28807] [4.2 Regression] wrong code with may_alias and structs
In-Reply-To: <bug-28807-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg01922.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-23 08:06 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a hard nut to crack, my *guess* is that if you just check the
> alias set of the type of the access, we are going to end up claiming any
> access to a structure containing a char variable is aliased.
You are correct as we regress with the following testcase:
struct a
{
  char a1;
};

int *aa;

void g(int *a)
{
  aa = a;
  *a = 2;
}

int t(int i, struct a *b)
{
  g(&i);
  b->a1 = 1;
  i = 2;
  if (b->a1 != 1)
    link_failure ();
}
int main(void)
{
  struct a b;
  t(1, &b);
  return 0;
}


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28807