public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates
@ 2006-08-18 3:28 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-18 3:30 ` [Bug c++/28766] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-18 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following should be able to compile but does not:
struct A { int i; };
template<int t>
void foo()
{
((struct A) { 0 }).i += 1;
}
void g(void)
{
foo<0>();
}
--------
If we remove the template on foo, the statement with compund literal expression
is accepted.
--
Summary: compound literal expression vs templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-18 3:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 1:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org ` (6 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-18 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 03:30 ------- This is not a regression as far as I can tell. Note I found this while working on PR 28418. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |2.95.3 3.0.4 3.2.2 3.2.3 | |3.3.1 4.0.0 3.4.0 4.2.0 Summary| compound literal expression|compound literal expression |vs templates |vs templates http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 3:30 ` [Bug c++/28766] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-24 1:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-08-24 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-08-24 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-08-24 01:57 ------- It doesn't seem to matter for me whether the function is a template or not. Which version did you use to get to that statement? W. -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 3:30 ` [Bug c++/28766] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 1:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-08-24 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 1:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-24 3:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 03:29 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > It doesn't seem to matter for me whether the function is a template or > not. Which version did you use to get to that statement? 4.2.0 20060821 works without the template in that the following works: struct A { int i; }; void foo() { ((struct A) { 0 }).i += 1; } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2006-08-24 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 1:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2009-04-16 17:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-10-12 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 01:45 ------- Confirmed. The template version doesn't compile, whereas the non-template version does. W. -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-12 01:45:19 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2006-10-12 1:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:02 ------- Fixed in at least 4.4.0 and above. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2009-04-16 17:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:03 ------- Mine to commit the testcase. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2009-04-16 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ------- Fixed so closing. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ------- Subject: Bug 28766 Author: pinskia Date: Thu Apr 16 17:07:06 2009 New Revision: 146203 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146203 Log: 2009-04-16 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> PR C++/28766 * g++.dg/ext/complit11.C: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/complit11.C Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-16 17:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-08-18 3:28 [Bug c++/28766] New: compound literal expression vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 3:30 ` [Bug c++/28766] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 1:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-08-24 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 1:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2009-04-16 17:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-16 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).