From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3525 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2006 21:59:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2872 invoked by uid 48); 25 Aug 2006 21:59:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060825215918.2871.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/28850] missed call -> jmp transformation; redundant unwind stuff with empty finally In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg02206.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 21:59 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > It's not entirely clear from your report, but this looks like a bug of PR13397? No it is not fully related. One of the problems is that we don't remove empty finnally blocks. Reduced testcase for that problem: struct bomber { ~bomber() { } }; int g(void); int f(void) { bomber a; g(); } -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-25 21:59:14 date| | Summary|missed call -> jmp |missed call -> jmp |transformation; redundant |transformation; redundant |unwind stuff. |unwind stuff with empty | |finally http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850