From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-195170-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24132 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2006 03:05:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 24051 invoked by uid 48); 28 Aug 2006 03:04:52 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060828030452.24050.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-26577-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c++/26577] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size with volatile and non POD
In-Reply-To: <bug-26577-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg02402.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-28 03:04 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> An even smaller test case without a member function is:
Even smaller:
struct A
{
  A(const A&);
  A& operator=(const A&);
};
void f(volatile A *a) { *a; }


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26577