public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
@ 2006-05-07 19:29 uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-07 19:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] " uros at kss-loka dot si
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: uros at kss-loka dot si @ 2006-05-07 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]
This ICE happens during compilation of PovRay-3.6.1 with -msse2
-ftree-vectorize (also on x86_64). The ICE is in express.cpp.
The reduced testcase is attached, this is the failure with -O -ftree-vectorize:
g++ -O -ftree-vectorize -m32 -msse2 reduced.cpp
reduced.cpp: In function void pov::Parse_Num_Factor(double*, int*):
reduced.cpp:94: internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have
struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
Please submit a full bug report,
[etc]
The same failure happens with g++ -O -ftree-vectorize on x86_64.
--
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have
struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: uros at kss-loka dot si
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
@ 2006-05-07 19:31 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-08 7:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: uros at kss-loka dot si @ 2006-05-07 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-05-07 19:30 -------
Created an attachment (id=11396)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11396&action=view)
Reduced cpp testcase
The testcase, reduced with Delta.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-07 19:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] " uros at kss-loka dot si
@ 2006-05-08 7:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 07:45 -------
Confirmed.
;; basic block 3, loop depth 0, count 0
;; prev block 2, next block 4
;; pred: 2 [30.0%] (exec)
;; succ: 5 [50.0%] (true,exec) 4 [50.0%] (false,exec)
<L0>:;
# SFT.19 = V_MAY_DEF <SFT.19>;
# SFT.20 = V_MAY_DEF <SFT.20>;
# SFT.21 = V_MAY_DEF <SFT.21>;
# SMT.29_86 = V_MAY_DEF <SMT.29_91>;
Parse_Float_Param2 (&Val, &Val2);
# VUSE <SMT.29_86>;
Val.1_15 = Val;
D.2463_16 = ABS_EXPR <Val.1_15>;
if (D.2463_16 > 1.0000000000000000364321973154977415791655470656e-10) goto
<L2>; else goto <L1>;
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-05-08 07:45:56
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-07 19:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] " uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-08 7:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-05 10:10 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 07:50 -------
Looks a lot like 26197.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |26197
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-08 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-05 10:10 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-08-19 23:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] " tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: uros at kss-loka dot si @ 2006-07-05 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-07-05 10:10 -------
This still fails with current mainline gcc.
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2006-05-08 07:45:56 |2006-07-05 10:10:38
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-05 10:10 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
@ 2006-08-19 23:05 ` tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-19 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 23:05 -------
Created an attachment (id=12100)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12100&action=view)
test case
Testcase from application "ser".
Fails on x86_64 with: gcc -ftree-vectorize -O -c
Fails on x86 with: gcc -ftree-vectorize -O -msse2 -c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-19 23:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] " tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 14:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:43 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-07-05 10:10:38 |2006-08-29 14:16:29
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 14:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 14:43 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:53 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-08-29 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 14:43 -------
I cannot reproduce the problem with neither of the testcases, neither on i686
nor from x86_64 crosscompiler. Could you please check whether it did not get
fixed in the meantime?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 14:43 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-29 14:53 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-08-29 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2006-08-29 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-08-29 14:53 -------
Yes, seems so - fails with 4.2.0 20060721, works with 4.2.0 20060819 on x86_64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-29 14:53 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-08-29 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-29 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 17:04 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26197 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-29 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-07 19:29 [Bug tree-optimization/27474] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776 uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-07 19:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] " uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-08 7:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-05 10:10 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-08-19 23:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] " tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:16 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:43 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 14:53 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-08-29 17:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).