From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29319 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2006 19:47:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 29204 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2006 19:47:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060829194746.29203.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/28866] [Regression] Simple if statements are not so simple In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg02581.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 19:47 ------- Subject: Bug 28866 Author: kargl Date: Tue Aug 29 19:47:31 2006 New Revision: 116570 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116570 Log: 2006-08-29 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/28866 * match.c: Wrap copyright. (gfc_match_assignment): Return MATCH_NO for failed lvalue. Remove gotos. Move error handling of FL_PARAMETER to ... * gfc_match_if: Deal with MATCH_NO from above. * primary.c: Wrap copyright. (match_variable): ... here. Improve error messages. 2006-08-29 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/28866 * gfortran.dg/simpleif_2.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/pr19936_1.f90: Adjust dg-error message. * gfortran.dg/enum_5.f90: Ditto. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/enum_5.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr19936_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/simpleif_2.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28866