public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dje at watson dot ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/27287] [4.1/4.2 Regression] returning constant double
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060830180843.1856.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27287-11164@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #29 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com  2006-08-30 18:08 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1/4.2 Regression] returning constant double 

        Yes, I was testing out the same change as your second patch.  That
looks reasonable if it works.

        By the way, the use of "%H" in the frob patterns is completely
wrong and should be removed. %H does not mean high register.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27287


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-30 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-24 15:58 [Bug c/27287] New: pukes eliot at sonic dot net
2006-04-24 15:59 ` [Bug c/27287] pukes eliot at sonic dot net
2006-04-24 16:20 ` [Bug target/27287] loading 0 constant causes an ICE (freescale's messy targets) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-25 16:44 ` eliot at sonic dot net
2006-07-08  2:29 ` [Bug target/27287] [4.1/4.2 Regression] returning constant double pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-08  2:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-08  2:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-08  2:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-08  3:14 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-13 16:08 ` edmar at freescale dot com
2006-07-13 16:31 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-07-13 18:01 ` edmar at freescale dot com
2006-07-13 19:58 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-07-13 20:09 ` edmar at freescale dot com
2006-07-13 20:36 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-07-13 20:48 ` edmar at freescale dot com
2006-07-14 17:19 ` edmar at freescale dot com
2006-07-14 17:44 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-14 17:47 ` [Bug target/27287] [4.1 " dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-26 20:23 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-26 20:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 19:12 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-08-29 19:26 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-08-29 20:23 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-08-29 20:49 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 20:51 ` [Bug target/27287] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29 21:09 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-30 15:16 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-08-30 18:00 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-08-30 18:08 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com [this message]
2006-08-30 18:42 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-08-30 20:40 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-08-31  2:36 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-31  5:15 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-08-31 13:50 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-08-31 14:24 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-09-01 19:56 ` dje at watson dot ibm dot com
2006-09-01 21:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-02 13:23 ` guenter at roeck-us dot net
2006-09-11 17:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-13  5:25 ` [Bug target/27287] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 15:18 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 15:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060830180843.1856.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).