From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27886 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2006 20:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 27819 invoked by uid 48); 30 Aug 2006 20:40:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060830204047.27818.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/27287] [4.1/4.2 Regression] returning constant double In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "guenter at roeck-us dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg02715.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #31 from guenter at roeck-us dot net 2006-08-30 20:40 ------- > > By the way, the use of "%H" in the frob patterns is completely > wrong and should be removed. %H does not mean high register. > I did wonder about that, since it does not seem to be used elsewhere, but I did not really know or understand enough to comment on it. Regarding evlwwsplat - after looking into its definition, I don't think it should be used, but I may be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27287