public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/28408] What should be value of complex<double>(1.0,0.0) *= -1?
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906185012.6525.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28408-11211@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 18:50 -------
There are most likely a couple of different issues here. A front-end one with
(1.0+0.0i)*(-1) being expanded incorrectly, there is a bug about a case like
that too, see PR 24581. There might even be a libstdc++ one too all depending
on how the complex class is implemented. I have not looked into libstdc++ to
check yet.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28408
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-17 10:21 [Bug c++/28408] New: " mec at google dot com
2006-07-18 13:34 ` [Bug c++/28408] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-09-06 17:11 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-06 17:12 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-06 18:43 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-06 18:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-09-06 19:19 ` pluto at agmk dot net
2006-09-06 20:23 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-06 20:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-06 20:59 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-07 0:44 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-07 1:24 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-07 1:33 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-07 1:51 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-07 1:52 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-07 1:58 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-07 2:04 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-07 2:30 ` bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu
2006-09-07 2:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-07 9:11 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-27 7:51 ` jan at etpmod dot phys dot tue dot nl
2006-09-27 8:08 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060906185012.6525.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).