From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18709 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2006 20:38:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 18648 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2006 20:37:56 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060909203756.18647.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/27707] g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C fails In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2006-09-09 20:37 ------- Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C fails On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: > ------- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-09-09 18:45 ------- > Subject: Re: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C fails > > > I don't know what should be the difference between hpux and linux PA, though > > this is an issue of IVOPTs and rtl costs. > > I've the dump files for hppa-unknown-linux-gnu and hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. It confirms that it is the same problem as on i?86, but it doesn't tell why. I don't see an obvious difference in config/pa/ Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27707