From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4551 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2006 13:24:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 4513 invoked by uid 48); 10 Sep 2006 13:24:30 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060910132430.4512.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/23955] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Compile time regressions with tramp3d In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg00766.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 13:24 ------- Compile time is reasonable again, memory usage regressions are just tree-ssa, we have plenty of other PRs for this. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to fail| |4.0.3 4.1.0 Known to work| |4.2.0 4.1.2 Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23955