public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/20599] variadic template support
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060912155053.32207.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-20599-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2006-09-12 15:50 -------
Then the real issue maybe is the following: what are we going to do vs C++0x
features? Shall we set-up the compiler switch for it (-std=c++0x?) and start
adding things? Or people believe it's too early? Maybe a good compromise would
be wait for inclusion in the draft, to wit before C++0x (but later than now for
variadic templates, for example)?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20599


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-12 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-20599-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-09-12 15:36 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 15:51 ` pcarlini at suse dot de [this message]
2006-09-12 18:27 ` doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
2006-09-12 18:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-12 20:30 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2006-09-13  6:20 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-15  8:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-25  3:38 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2006-09-25  3:46 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
2006-09-25 13:00 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-03-10  1:59 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-10  2:02 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-12  6:22 ` fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
2007-03-12  9:26 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-03-28 14:30 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-23  6:01 [Bug c++/20599] New: " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-23 15:13 ` [Bug c++/20599] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060912155053.32207.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).