From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25750 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2006 06:21:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 25668 invoked by uid 48); 13 Sep 2006 06:21:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060913062103.25667.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/28964] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] partition_stack_vars uses unstable sort In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg01181.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 06:21 ------- Confirmed, this is a regression as partition_stack_vars is new in 4.0.x. I am thinking about either creating a meta-bug or a keyword about all the problems with unstable sorts/hashing with memory addresses problems. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-13 06:21:02 date| | Summary|partition_stack_vars uses |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |unstable sort |partition_stack_vars uses | |unstable sort Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28964