From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31308 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2006 05:40:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 31216 invoked by uid 48); 15 Sep 2006 05:40:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060915054002.31215.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/29090] gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 failures on Darwin PPC at -m64 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg01449.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-15 05:40 ------- This is most likely an ABI issue where one side of the function call thinks one thing and the other side thinks another about placement of the arguments. This shows up a lot in the darwin back-end even in 32bit mode and nobody has fixed it yet. It shows up with var-args than normal function calls in 32bit mode. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29090