* [Bug c++/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
@ 2006-09-16 16:42 ` kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 16:43 ` [Bug middle-end/29109] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kalium at gmx dot de @ 2006-09-16 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:42 -------
Created an attachment (id=12283)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12283&action=view)
qt-3.3.6-gcc3.patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 16:42 ` [Bug c++/29109] " kalium at gmx dot de
@ 2006-09-16 16:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-16 16:52 ` kalium at gmx dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-16 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 16:43 -------
We need a self contained testcase for this issue.
Really reporting 3.4.x bugs means you will not see this fixed as 3.4.x is no
longer supported.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Component|c++ |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 16:42 ` [Bug c++/29109] " kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 16:43 ` [Bug middle-end/29109] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-16 16:52 ` kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 16:54 ` kalium at gmx dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kalium at gmx dot de @ 2006-09-16 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:52 -------
So you have a long-developed and relatively stable and good compiler and you
don't develop it any more? Not good. The 4+ branch is pretty unstable. I had
to downgrade the gcc 4.1.1 compiler on my Athlon XP and on my VIA C3 systems
because the systems randomly just hard-locked since the upgrade and the
recompilation of the packages.
I will not give an isolated test case, but the information on
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133301 may even help more.
--
kalium at gmx dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 16:52 ` kalium at gmx dot de
@ 2006-09-16 16:54 ` kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 21:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kalium at gmx dot de @ 2006-09-16 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:54 -------
Note: the words "under hardened" in the title of the Gentoo Linux bug report
are wrong -- the problem also occurs with a plain vanilla/non-hardened gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 16:54 ` kalium at gmx dot de
@ 2006-09-16 21:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-16 21:18 ` kalium at gmx dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-16 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 21:13 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I will not give an isolated test case, but the information on
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133301 may even help more.
SSP is not part of GCC until 4.x so we really cannot support that. And it was
rewritten to be better anyways. So this is not a bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 21:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-16 21:18 ` kalium at gmx dot de
2006-09-16 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: kalium at gmx dot de @ 2006-09-16 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 21:17 -------
Like I already said, this has nothing to do with hardened extensions. Look at
my patch. It is a problem related to the parser: bad code gets produced when
"XWindowAttributes a;" is not at the beginning.
--
kalium at gmx dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 21:18 ` kalium at gmx dot de
@ 2006-09-16 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-16 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 21:20 -------
Waiting for a real testcase then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6
2006-09-16 16:41 [Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 kalium at gmx dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-16 21:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-16 5:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-16 05:48 -------
No testcase in 3 months so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread