From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20286 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2006 21:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 20260 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2006 21:27:53 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060918212753.20259.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/29132] [4.2 Regression] Mips exception handling broken. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "roger at eyesopen dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg01744.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #1 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-09-18 21:27 ------- Hi David, I was wondering if you have a MIPS tree handy, whether you could easily test the following single line patch: Index: dwarf2out.c =================================================================== *** dwarf2out.c (revision 117035) --- dwarf2out.c (working copy) *************** dwarf2out_begin_prologue (unsigned int l *** 2572,2578 **** fde = &fde_table[fde_table_in_use++]; fde->decl = current_function_decl; fde->dw_fde_begin = dup_label; ! fde->dw_fde_current_label = NULL; fde->dw_fde_hot_section_label = NULL; fde->dw_fde_hot_section_end_label = NULL; fde->dw_fde_unlikely_section_label = NULL; --- 2572,2578 ---- fde = &fde_table[fde_table_in_use++]; fde->decl = current_function_decl; fde->dw_fde_begin = dup_label; ! fde->dw_fde_current_label = dup_label; fde->dw_fde_hot_section_label = NULL; fde->dw_fde_hot_section_end_label = NULL; fde->dw_fde_unlikely_section_label = NULL; Due to all the abstraction with debugging formats, its difficult to tell the order in which things get executed, and whether this initial value for dw_fde_current_label survives long enough to avoid use of a set_loc. Many thanks in advance, -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29132