public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/29129] [4.2 Regression] Strictly conforming code rejected Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:24:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20060919032424.4307.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-29129-6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:24 ------- Confirmed, a regression from 4.1.2 which we accepted this but gave a warning saying we don't implement the semantics yet. Since we accepted this with a warning before and now reject it, I am going to say this is a regression. Note I think Mike Stump's work in this area caused this bug but I am not 100% for sure. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |blocker Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |rejects-valid Known to fail| |4.2.0 Known to work| |4.1.2 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-19 03:24:24 date| | Summary|Strictly conforming code |[4.2 Regression] Strictly |rejected |conforming code rejected Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29129
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-19 3:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-09-18 14:07 [Bug c/29129] New: " neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 3:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2006-09-19 11:10 ` [Bug c/29129] [4.2 Regression] " joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-09-19 13:04 ` neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-09-21 2:08 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 12:31 ` [Bug c/29129] [4.2 Regression] [DR needed] unnamed parameters using [*] jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 23:48 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-17 0:15 ` [Bug c/29129] [4.2/4.3 " jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 21:37 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:55 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 20:47 ` [Bug c/29129] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-03 20:33 ` [Bug c/29129] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] [DR#341] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-04 0:59 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-04 1:01 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20060919032424.4307.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).