From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22738 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2006 16:53:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 22438 invoked by uid 48); 21 Sep 2006 16:53:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060921165349.22437.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/25737] ACATS c974001 c974013 hang with struct aliasing In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg02068.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #35 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 16:53 ------- > I suspect the reality is there is some fundamental misunderstanding of > how aliasing or addressability works on the part of the Ada folks (no > offense to them, it's just the arguments they keep offering are, well, > strange to anyone who understands aliasing). I suspect that we were simply not on the same page, you being at a general level about aliasing/addressability and I being at the implementation level about DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P and TYPE_NONALIASED_COMPONENT. As I told Richard in Ottawa, I plan to revisit this for 4.3. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25737