From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3004 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2006 04:06:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 2973 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2006 04:06:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060926040636.2972.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/29231] need a way to produce trampolines not on the stack In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "acahalan at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg02422.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 04:06 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > If you tried the page-of-functions idea, what would you do if you'd used all > the functions on the page and needed another one? > You'd do the same as if you'd used up all the stack space. The existing method doesn't handle running out of room, and I don't see why the requirements would be any different for this method. -- acahalan at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |acahalan at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29231