From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1622 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2006 19:30:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 1587 invoked by uid 48); 28 Sep 2006 19:30:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060928193022.1586.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/29206] [4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg02696.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-09-28 19:30 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Either show that it is a regression, or dont put the regression marker in the > subject. rechecked, that it is a regression on hppa-linux-gnu, compared to 4.1.2 SVN. Matthias -- debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |4.2.0 Known to work| |4.1.2 Summary|gcj-dbtool segfaults |[4.2 regression] gcj-dbtool | |segfaults http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29206