From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25609 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2006 00:37:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 25449 invoked by uid 48); 29 Sep 2006 00:37:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060929003739.25448.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/29254] [4.2 Regression] verify_cgraph_node failed (inlined_to pointer is set but no predecessors found) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "lopezibanez at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-09/txt/msg02715.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-29 00:37 ------- Not so surprising if you check gcc/c-typeck.c line 3980. The warning is not conditionalised to any option. What is the criteria for a warning to be emitted always or be conditional to a given option? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29254