public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2006-01-08 6:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-08 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 06:00 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Isn't this a dup of bug 19101? No but it is related to it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-01-08 6:00 ` [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-09 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 06:59 ------- I will see if I can fix this. I fear some serious messing with all the matching routines may be required if it can not be handled in scanner.c -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2005-12-30 18:58:12 |2006-03-09 06:59:44 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-01-08 6:00 ` [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-09-20 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-20 02:45 ------- Subject: Bug number PR19260 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00854.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 03:58 ------- Subject: Bug 19260 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Oct 3 03:58:20 2006 New Revision: 117384 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117384 Log: 2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/19262 * gfortran.h (gfc_option_t): Add max_continue_fixed and max_continue_free. * options.c (gfc_init_options): Initialize fixed form and free form consecutive continuation line limits. * scanner.c (gfc_scanner_init_1): Initialize continue_line and continue_count. (gfc_next_char_literal): Count the number of continuation lines in the current statement and warn if limit is exceeded. 2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/19260 * scanner.c (gfc_next_char_literal): Add check for missing '&' and warn if in_string, otherwise return ' '. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h trunk/gcc/fortran/options.c trunk/gcc/fortran/scanner.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 04:10 ------- Subject: Bug 19260 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Oct 3 04:09:49 2006 New Revision: 117385 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117385 Log: 2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/19260 * gfortran.dg/continuation.f90: Rename to continuation_1.f90. * gfortran.dg/continuation_2.f90: New test. PR fortran/19262 * gfortran.dg/continuation_3.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/continuation_4.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/continuation_5.f: New test. * gfortran.dg/continuation_6.f: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_1.f90 - copied unchanged from r117065, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_2.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_3.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_4.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_5.f trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_6.f Removed: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-03 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 04:11 ------- Fixed on 4.2 -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation [not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-10-05 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-05 17:34 ------- Subject: Bug number PR19260 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00255.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] New: & not required when splitting a token in continuation
@ 2005-01-05 11:12 Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-05 18:11 ` [Bug fortran/19260] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de @ 2005-01-05 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
$ cat continuation.f90
print *,s&
in(1.)
end
$ gfortran continuation.f90
$ ./a.out
0.8414710
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20050102/configure --prefix=/home/zfkts
--enable-languages=c,c++,f95
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20050102 (experimental)
$ gfortran -dumpmachine
ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
The above program is illegal, there should be a "&" as the first
nonblank character in the second line.
--
Summary: & not required when splitting a token in continuation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation 2005-01-05 11:12 [Bug fortran/19260] New: " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de @ 2005-01-05 18:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-01-05 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 18:10 ------- Confirmed. See sec. 3.3.1.3.1. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-05 18:10:58 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation 2005-01-05 11:12 [Bug fortran/19260] New: " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-01-05 18:11 ` [Bug fortran/19260] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-04-08 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08 21:00 ------- Isn't this a dup of bug 19101? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-05 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19260-9515@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-08 6:00 ` [Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-09 6:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 2:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-10-03 3:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03 4:10 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03 4:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05 17:34 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2005-01-05 11:12 [Bug fortran/19260] New: " Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
2005-01-05 18:11 ` [Bug fortran/19260] " tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-08 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).