From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26818 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2006 18:11:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 26296 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2006 18:10:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061003181002.26295.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/28690] [4.2 Regression] Performace problem with indexed load/stores on powerpc In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dje at watson dot ibm dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #22 from dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2006-10-03 18:09 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Performace problem with indexed load/stores on powerpc I am not suggesting that the problem has to be solved in swap_commutative_operands, etc. I would think that GCC should be able to create commutative addresses where they are formed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28690