public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/29244] New: bad relocation section name
@ 2006-09-26 20:44 jmbnyc at gmail dot com
2006-09-26 20:46 ` [Bug c++/29244] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jmbnyc at gmail dot com @ 2006-09-26 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I continue to get the errors below when trying to link fairly straight forward
C++ programs. The same code will compile/link fine with the opposite compile
type (the two compile types are -O2 and -g). If I mod the code slighly, I can
usually narrow it down to a single line that when commented out allows the link
to occur. Can anyone tell me what the origin of this message is and why it
might be generated from the linker.
/JMB
collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]
/usr/bin/ld: build/ia32.linux/gcc32/cc-g/subscribeClient.o: bad
relocation section name `'
collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]
/usr/bin/ld: build/ia32.linux/gcc32/cc-O2/publishClient.o: bad
relocation section name `'
--
Summary: bad relocation section name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jmbnyc at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: gcc version 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)
GCC host triplet: linux fc5 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
GCC target triplet: x86-64 and ia32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29244
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/29244] bad relocation section name 2006-09-26 20:44 [Bug c++/29244] New: bad relocation section name jmbnyc at gmail dot com @ 2006-09-26 20:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 20:58 ` jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-26 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 20:46 ------- collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] /usr/bin/ld: build/ia32.linux/gcc32/cc-g/subscribeClient.o: bad relocation section name `' This is most likely a bug in your binutils you have install. I would first suggest you to update your FC5 and if that does not work, then report this to Redhat. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29244 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/29244] bad relocation section name 2006-09-26 20:44 [Bug c++/29244] New: bad relocation section name jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 20:46 ` [Bug c++/29244] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-26 20:58 ` jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jmbnyc at gmail dot com @ 2006-09-26 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 20:58 ------- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name As I suggested in my post, I am fully updated as of one hour ago. I reported the problem to redhat last week and never received a response. Do you have any idea what 'bad relocation section name' means and why it might appear? /JMB On 26 Sep 2006 20:46:48 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 20:46 ------- > collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] > /usr/bin/ld: build/ia32.linux/gcc32/cc-g/subscribeClient.o: bad > relocation section name `' > > This is most likely a bug in your binutils you have install. > I would first suggest you to update your FC5 and if that does not work, then > report this to Redhat. > > > -- > > pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |INVALID > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29244 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29244 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/29244] bad relocation section name 2006-09-26 20:44 [Bug c++/29244] New: bad relocation section name jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 20:46 ` [Bug c++/29244] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 20:58 ` jmbnyc at gmail dot com @ 2006-10-05 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-05 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 18:18 ------- *** Bug 29359 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29244 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-05 18:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-09-26 20:44 [Bug c++/29244] New: bad relocation section name jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 20:46 ` [Bug c++/29244] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 20:58 ` jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).