From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27632 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2006 16:07:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 24906 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2006 16:07:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061006160711.24903.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/28457] ext/pb_ds/regression/tree_data_map_rand.cc fails with a particular random seed. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-06 16:07 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > try again. Certainly I can confirm that the problem cannot be reproduced anymore by tweaking the random seed to 1153519516. > the thing about (now) throw_allocator is that if some of the testcases have > allocated memory and then an exception is thrown, the "leaked" memory is > actually testsuite-type temporaries that should have been deleted. > > So, this could be a false herring. Crazy... > Anyway. I think the the only remaining pb_ds regressions that show up regularly > are the priority_queue dijkstra tests on powerpc. In practice there is also priority_queue_rand.cc on ia64-linux, which however, as I mentioned in Comment #1, seems a miscompilation... I have no idea what to do about it, besides waiting and hoping for the best... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28457