From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2858 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2006 11:34:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 2810 invoked by uid 48); 9 Oct 2006 11:34:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061009113434.2809.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29373] implicit type declaration and contained function clash In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-09 11:34 ------- As I said, I ran into this when playing around with PR29267, and it was ugly enough to warrant a PR of its own. Glad you share my opinion :-) Just to make this clear: I would never do something this ugly outside bugzilla! (BTW I added you to the CC list, it is kinda hard to answer in the right place otherwise) -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29373