public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/29323] [4.0/4.1 Regression] set_nothrow_function_flags does invalid analysis on weak functions
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061010082725.30662.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29323-5394@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-10 08:27 -------
Fixed on the mainline.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]    |[4.0/4.1 Regression]
                   |set_nothrow_function_flags  |set_nothrow_function_flags
                   |does invalid analysis on    |does invalid analysis on
                   |weak functions              |weak functions


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29323


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-10  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-02 16:05 [Bug tree-optimization/29323] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-02 16:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/29323] " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-02 16:10 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-02 17:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29323] " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-03  5:26 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29323] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-09 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-09 16:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-10-10  8:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-10  8:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-10-14  9:14 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29323] [4.0/4.1 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14  9:14 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/29323] [4.0 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 20:30 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061010082725.30662.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).