From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32498 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2006 15:18:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32474 invoked by uid 48); 10 Oct 2006 15:18:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061010151810.32473.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/29390] Bogus symbol inserted into valid C++ code at low optimization level In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00804.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #13 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-10 15:18 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > In comment #9: shouldn't be too hard. > In comment #11: No, it will actually take significant time It's a long and boring process. It's not complicated, it just takes time. > If the explanation for the above discrepancy is simply not having access to a > FreeBSD machine, such an access can be arranged in an hour or so. No, you don't understand. I have no intention of doing this. I believe my time is better spent working on bugs that haven't been fixed on any current release branch yet. I have no interest in working on things that have been sorted out long ago. If you really want to see this fixed, you will have to find a volunteer who is willing to spend the necessary time and who has access to the relevant machines. That's just not me, sorry. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29390