From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24844 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2006 00:56:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 24816 invoked by uid 48); 12 Oct 2006 00:56:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061012005649.24815.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/23643] Incorrect conversion from derived to empty base class In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00953.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 00:56 ------- Why exactly do you think that the empty base should not be located at the same address as the simple_base base object? W. -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23643