From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9437 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2006 13:19:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 9396 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2006 13:19:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061013131936.9395.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/29433] using boost::MPL requires lots of memory In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg01140.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 13:19 ------- The bootleneck is clearly using the diagnostic machinery for setting up DECL_NAME of the type decls. I wonder if we cannot directly compute and store mangled names in DECL_NAME which would save both time and memory... Any ideas? Mark? Jason? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29433