* [Bug c++/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
@ 2006-09-27 11:30 ` bugreports at nn7 dot de
2006-09-27 16:02 ` [Bug target/29250] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: bugreports at nn7 dot de @ 2006-09-27 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from bugreports at nn7 dot de 2006-09-27 11:30 -------
Created an attachment (id=12338)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12338&action=view)
Preprocessed source
I was kindly asked to: 'Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccQLsVtW.out file,
please attach this to your bugreport.' So here we go :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
2006-09-27 11:30 ` [Bug c++/29250] " bugreports at nn7 dot de
@ 2006-09-27 16:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-27 16:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-27 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|critical |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
2006-09-27 11:30 ` [Bug c++/29250] " bugreports at nn7 dot de
2006-09-27 16:02 ` [Bug target/29250] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-27 16:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-27 17:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-27 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 16:21 -------
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-27 16:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-27 17:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 17:21 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-27 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-27 17:52 -------
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
struct TSparseEntry
{
int feat_index;
double entry;
};
struct TSparse
{
int vec_index;
int num_feat_entries;
struct TSparseEntry* features;
};
void
get_full_feature_matrix(struct TSparse* sparse_feature_matrix, int num_vec)
{
double* fm;
for (int v=0; v<num_vec; v++)
{
for (int f=0; f<sparse_feature_matrix[v].num_feat_entries; f++)
{
long long offs = sparse_feature_matrix[v].vec_index
+ sparse_feature_matrix[v].features[f].feat_index;
fm[offs]= sparse_feature_matrix[v].features[f].entry;
}
}
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-27 17:52:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-27 17:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 17:21 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 19:15 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 17:20 -------
How is expand even generating this? This is completely invalid RTL for PPC.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 17:21 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 19:15 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 23:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 19:15 -------
The expander is producing invalid RTL. If the index variable "offs" is changed
from "long long" to "long", the code compiles correctly and the memory loads
are placed in temporary pseudos. Only with "long long" does GCC punt and
expand to a sum of memory references.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 19:15 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 23:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 23:39 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 23:02 -------
The reason this is going off the rails is a "long" index invokes
expand_expr_real_1 with PLUS_EXP and modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL while "long long"
invokes it with modifier=EXPAND_SUM. For EXPAND_NORMAL, GCC invokes
expand_operands() and then calls expand_binop(), which tests predicates. For
EXPAND_SUM, expand_operands() is followed by simplify_gen_binary(), which does
not check predicates. Invalid RTL is created and fun ensues.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 23:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 23:39 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 3:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 23:39 -------
<plus_expr 3000d410
type <pointer_type 30013e38
type <real_type 30013d00 double DF
size <integer_cst 30006760 constant invariant 64>
unit size <integer_cst 30006780 constant invariant 8>
align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 precision 64
pointer_to_this <pointer_type 30013e38>>
sizes-gimplified unsigned SI
size <integer_cst 300065c0 constant invariant 32>
unit size <integer_cst 30006280 constant invariant 4>
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1>
arg 0 <convert_expr 300c67a0 type <pointer_type 30013e38>
arg 0 <mult_expr 3000d3e8 type <integer_type 30013410 unsigned int>
arg 0 <convert_expr 300c6740 type <integer_type 30013410 unsigned
int>
arg 0 <nop_expr 300c66a0 type <integer_type 30013548 long long
int>
arg 0 <plus_expr 3000d398 type <integer_type 300133a8 int>
arg 0 <component_ref 3000d370 type <integer_type
300133a8 int>
arg 0 <indirect_ref 300c6680> arg 1 <field_decl
300c5ee0 feat_index>>
arg 1 <target_mem_ref 3013e7a8 type <integer_type
300133a8 int>
arg 1 <var_decl 3013dcb0 D.2073> arg 2 <var_decl
3013dd20 D.2074> arg 5 <component_ref 301440f0> arg 6 <symbol_memory_tag
3000dcf8 SMT.6>>>>>
arg 1 <integer_cst 300c6760 constant invariant 8>>>
arg 1 <var_decl 30131150 fm type <pointer_type 30013e38>
used tree_1 unsigned decl_5 SI file /farm/dje/gui.cc line 17 size
<integer_cst 300065c0 32> unit size <integer_cst 30006280 4>
align 32 context <function_decl 3012e100 get_full_feature_matrix>
(reg/v/f:SI 151 [ fm ])>>
The INDIRECT_REF case of expand_expr() sets modifier=EXPAND_SUM, but EXPAND_SUM
only should apply to the top level.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 23:39 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-14 3:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 3:34 ` [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-14 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 03:03 -------
Subject: Bug 29250
Author: dje
Date: Sat Oct 14 03:03:23 2006
New Revision: 117724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117724
Log:
2006-10-13 David Edelsohn <edelsohn@gnu.org>
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
PR middle-end/29250
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1) <NON_LVALUE_EXPR, NOP_EXPR,
CONVERT_EXPR>: Change EXPAND_SUM modifier to EXPAND_NORMAL when
recursing.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/expr.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-14 3:03 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-14 3:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-14 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-14 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 03:34 -------
A regression from 3.4.6, most likely exposed by the gimplifier or TER in out of
SSA. I really want to say the gimplifier with respect of type casting.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|4.2.0 4.0.4 |4.0.4
Known to work| |3.4.6 4.2.0
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.0/4.1 Regression]
|extract_insn, at |internal compiler error: in
|recog.c:2084 |extract_insn, at
| |recog.c:2084
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-14 3:34 ` [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-14 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-01 18:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-14 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 19:26 -------
A C89 testcase:
struct TSparseEntry
{
int feat_index;
double entry;
};
struct TSparse
{
int vec_index;
int num_feat_entries;
struct TSparseEntry* features;
};
void
get_full_feature_matrix(struct TSparse* sparse_feature_matrix, int num_vec)
{
double* fm;
int v, f;
for (v=0; v<num_vec; v++)
{
for (f=0; f<sparse_feature_matrix[v].num_feat_entries; f++)
{
long long offs = sparse_feature_matrix[v].vec_index
+ sparse_feature_matrix[v].features[f].feat_index;
fm[offs]= sparse_feature_matrix[v].features[f].entry;
}
}
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-14 19:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-01 18:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-02 17:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-04 4:07 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-01 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-01 18:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-02 17:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-04 4:07 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-02 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-02 17:19 -------
Subject: Bug 29250
Author: dje
Date: Thu Nov 2 17:18:52 2006
New Revision: 118421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118421
Log:
2006-10-13 David Edelsohn <edelsohn@gnu.org>
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
PR middle-end/29250
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1) <NON_LVALUE_EXPR, NOP_EXPR,
CONVERT_EXPR>: Change EXPAND_SUM modifier to EXPAND_NORMAL when
recursing.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/expr.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [Bug target/29250] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
2006-09-27 11:28 [Bug c++/29250] New: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 bugreports at nn7 dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-02 17:19 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-04 4:07 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-04 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-04 04:07 -------
Fixed on mainline, 4.2.0, and 4.1.2. Won't fix on 4.0 branch.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|3.4.6 4.2.0 |3.4.6 4.2.0 4.1.2
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread