From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7577 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2006 16:51:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 7517 invoked by uid 48); 16 Oct 2006 16:51:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061016165122.7516.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29216] Derived type components of function results are not initialised In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg01378.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:51 ------- Created an attachment (id=12446) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12446&action=view) Fix for this and PR29394 As well as fixing these PRs, this patch provides an option -finitialize-null, which does just that to all variables. I am just about to apply it to workstation's tree and will submit it tonight after another round of regtetsing. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #12406|0 |1 is obsolete| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29216