public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/27732] [4.0 Regression] Parentheses elicit spurious error: "missing '>' to terminate the template argument list"
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061016232523.14860.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27732-10061@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-16 23:25 -------
James --

Case #1 in Comment #1 is accepted by current G++ 4.1 and mainline branches.  I
do not believe Case #2 is valid, as the standard says that a non-type template
argument may be:

    the address of an object or function with external linkage,  includ-
    ing  function templates and function template-ids but excluding non-
    static class members, expressed as & id-expression

Thus, the parentheses make this case invalid.  Admittedly, that's pedantic, but
I think that's what the standard says.

Comment #3 is a separate enhancement request, and should be refiled separately.

Thanks,

-- Mark


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]    |[4.0 Regression] Parentheses
                   |Parentheses elicit spurious |elicit spurious error:
                   |error: "missing '>' to      |"missing '>' to terminate
                   |terminate the template      |the template argument list"
                   |argument list"              |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27732


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-16 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-22 20:08 [Bug c++/27732] New: " widman at gimpel dot com
2006-05-22 22:46 ` [Bug c++/27732] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-05-23 15:10 ` widman at gimpel dot com
2006-09-17 19:30 ` [Bug c++/27732] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-16 23:25 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-02-03 17:22 ` [Bug c++/27732] [4.0 " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061016232523.14860.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).