From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-199909-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18471 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2006 09:20:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 18297 invoked by uid 48); 17 Oct 2006 09:19:59 -0000
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:20:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20061017091959.18296.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-21678-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c++/21678] Using inline disables warnings about missing return statements
In-Reply-To: <bug-21678-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg01470.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-17 09:19 -------
Actually with inline functions we don't reach building the cfg but throw away
the function early:

Initial entry points:
Unit entry points:

Initial callgraph:

int fii(int*)/0: tree finalized
  called by:
  calls:

Reclaiming functions: int fii(int*)

Reclaimed callgraph:

...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21678