From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4101 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2006 16:03:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 4055 invoked by uid 48); 24 Oct 2006 16:02:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061024160258.4054.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/29582] Parameter pushed to stack too soon In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "schwab at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg02109.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-10-24 16:02 ------- The evaluation order of function arguments is not specified. If you depend on side effects to be carried out at a specific point you must make sure there is a sequence point at the appropriate place. -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29582