From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23499 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2006 11:35:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 22994 invoked by uid 48); 29 Oct 2006 11:35:30 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061029113530.22993.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/29631] [4.1 regression] Incorrect zero extension of signed short IV In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg02461.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-29 11:35 ------- > So this is another loop.c bug. Confirmed. > This is why it was removed, it was full of bugs :). With this criterion VRP wouldn't have survived either. :-) -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-29 11:35:30 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29631