public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/26797] [4.2/4.3 regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 fail
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061030090447.5813.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26797-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #22 from law at redhat dot com  2006-10-30 09:04 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e
        cxh1001 fail

On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:17 +0000, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> 
> ------- Comment #21 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-29 23:17 -------
> After the latest changes to VRP, only cxh1001 still fails on mainline.
Maybe so, but that would most likely be by accident, not by design.  In
fact, that probably indicates an optimization regression in the recent
changes to VRP.


The Ada front-end was generating bogus trees for some of those tests
and unless the Ada front-end has been fixed we shouldn't really
consider those problems fixed.

jeff


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26797


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-30  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-22  7:29 [Bug ada/26797] New: [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 wrong code laurent at guerby dot net
2006-03-22 10:33 ` [Bug ada/26797] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-22 18:48 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-22 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-23 13:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26797] " baldrick at free dot fr
2006-03-27 17:09 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-03-27 17:23 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-03-27 20:12 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2006-03-27 20:31 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-03-28  3:56 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2006-03-28 15:01 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-03-28 15:33 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-03-30  7:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-30  8:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-30  8:32 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-30 12:13 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2006-04-21 23:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26797] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 fail pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-21 23:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-21 23:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04  8:27 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2006-06-04 18:19 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-26 23:41 ` laurent at guerby dot net
2006-06-27  3:05 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2006-10-29 23:17 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.2/4.3 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-30  9:04 ` law at redhat dot com [this message]
2006-10-30  9:21 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-04 10:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-04 10:08 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-08  9:57 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS cxh1001 fails baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-08 12:54 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-08 16:06 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-08 16:52 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-09 10:41 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-09 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-09 11:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-09 11:35 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-09 11:50 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-09 13:59 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-09 14:19 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-09 14:29 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-09 22:44 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-09 23:10 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-09 23:13 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-09 23:41 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-10  0:17 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-03-10 16:52 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-13 10:30 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-13 12:34 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2007-09-12 15:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-12 15:55 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-15  6:35 ` law at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061030090447.5813.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).