public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kreckel at ginac dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/29186] optimzation breaks floating point exception flag reading
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061031114854.17233.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29186-1882@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1362 bytes --]



------- Comment #16 from kreckel at ginac dot de  2006-10-31 11:48 -------
A quote from <http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/IEEE754.PDF>:

"While on the subject of miscreant compilers, we should remark their
increasingly common tendency to reorder operations that can be executed
concurrently by pipelined computers. C programmers may declare a variable
volatile to inhibit certain reorderings. A programmer's intention is thwarted
when an alleged 'optimization' moves a floating-point instruction past a
procedure-call intended to deal with a flag in the floating-point status word
or to write into the control word to alter trapping or rounding. Bad moves like
these have been made even by compilers that come supplied with such procedures
in their libraries. (See _control87 , _clear87 and _status87 in compilers for
Intel processors.) Operations’ movements would be easier to debug if they
were highlighted by the compiler in its annotated re-listing of the
source-code. Meanwhile, so long as compilers mishandle attempts to cope with
floating-point exceptions, flags and modes in the ways intended by IEEE
Standard 754, frustrated programmers will abandon such attempts and compiler
writers will infer wrongly that unexercised capabilities are unexercised for
lack of demand."


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29186


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-31 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-22 19:13 [Bug c/29186] New: " kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-09-22 19:24 ` [Bug c/29186] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-22 19:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-22 19:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-22 22:34 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-09-23 21:41 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-09-23 21:52 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-23 22:11 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-09-23 22:19 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-23 22:58 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-09-23 23:02 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2006-09-24  0:35 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
2006-09-24 16:51 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-09-25  7:40 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-10-25  7:54 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-10-25  7:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-25 13:22 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-10-31 11:49 ` kreckel at ginac dot de [this message]
2006-11-06 22:23 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-11-19 11:22 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2006-11-19 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-04  6:47 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2009-12-29 21:48 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-29186-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-11-09 11:55 ` kreckel at ginac dot de
2020-11-09 12:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-14 19:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061031114854.17233.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).