From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8807 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 20:09:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 8334 invoked by uid 48); 31 Oct 2006 20:08:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061031200852.8333.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/29335] transcendental functions with constant arguments should be resolved at compile-time In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg02730.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #27 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-31 20:08 ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Yes, it's true that it is useful to have this value. But determining it > separately is quite easy, without taking a noticeable additional time in > average. It's likely that I'll end up doing it, so would you please tell me how? Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29335