From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19401 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2006 17:00:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19258 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2006 17:00:35 -0000 Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061105170035.19257.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/27698] subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a useful error. In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00364.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #9 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-11-05 17:00 ------- Subject: Re: subroutine _foo draws "unclassifiable statement" instead of a useful error. On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 04:37:42PM -0000, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > How does Intel's iand other commercial compilers handle > > a leading dollar? The standard is quite clear that the > > first character in a name is an alphabetic character. > > > ifort-9.1.xx accept it without any notice. > Why would a leading dollar be different to anywhere else in a name? > IIRC, the use of $ is a Digital extension on VMS. It's been more than 15 years since I used VMS, but I vaguely remmeber seeing Fortran with the $ only in the 2nd position. But, if Intel (a Digital descented) accepts the leading dollar sign, then your suggested modification is probably correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27698