From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-202386-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14034 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2006 01:06:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 14009 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2006 01:06:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20061114010600.14008.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-29751-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/29751] not optimizing access a[0] , a[1]
In-Reply-To: <bug-29751-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg01196.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-14 01:06 -------
This is a problem of our VOPs not having base+offset and has nothing to do with
restrict.


int f(int *r)
{
  r[0] = 0;
  r[1] = 0;
  if(r[0]) foo();
}

is enough to reproduce the issue.  Also I think there might be a couple dups of
this with respect of structs instead.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Missed optimization of      |not optimizing access a[0] ,
                   |restrict pointer assigned   |a[1]
                   |value                       |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29751