public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/29518] [4.0 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:00:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20061114050031.24505.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-29518-5078@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 05:00 ------- Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |[4.0 Regression] rejects |rejects valid template |valid template argument, |argument, enums vs templates|enums vs templates http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29518
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-14 5:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-10-19 21:16 [Bug c++/29518] New: incorrect " wb at fnal dot gov 2006-10-19 21:19 ` [Bug c++/29518] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 21:23 ` wb at fnal dot gov 2006-10-19 21:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 21:32 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-10-19 21:42 ` [Bug c++/29518] diagnostic on correct code; regression from 3.4.4 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 21:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 21:57 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-10-19 21:57 ` [Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 21:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 21:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-20 7:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-20 14:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-01 18:31 ` [Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 11:04 ` news at derived-software dot ltd dot uk 2006-11-12 16:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 4:21 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:52 ` [Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 18:41 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 5:00 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 5:00 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2006-11-25 4:32 ` [Bug c++/29518] [4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 1:09 ` chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 20:42 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20061114050031.24505.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).