From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10494 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2006 16:44:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 10456 invoked by uid 48); 14 Nov 2006 16:44:11 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061114164411.10455.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29711] error_print does not support %N$X In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg01293.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 16:44 ------- What about: de.f90:4: use foo, only : bar 1 Fehler: Bei (1) referenziertes Symbol »bar« nicht im Modul »foo« gefunden My limited german knowledge seems to indicate that it's OK, but I'm not sure. Could you try the attached patch on a few cases (possibly including multiple loci and such arguments reorganizations)? -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29711