From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13959 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2006 02:03:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 13923 invoked by uid 48); 17 Nov 2006 02:03:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061117020305.13922.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/29818] code with SSE segfaults with gcc-3.4.6, runs fine with gcc-4.1.1 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sergstesh at yahoo dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg01530.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #10 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-17 02:03 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Please see > > > > Can you try the patch mentioned in: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01005.html > > (I am about to submit a new version of the patch but it does not change > functionality of the patch, just some style issues). > > If that does not work, this is most likely an issue with unions and vector > accesses which is really PR 28367. I am working slowly on these two issues > because I have other work I need to do for Sony. > I am confused. Is this patch supposed to fix segmentation fault described in this report, so the patch needs to be applied to gcc-3.4.6 OR this patch is supposed to improve performance of gcc-4.1.1 WRT SSE ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818