From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 475 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2006 20:10:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 393 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2006 20:10:05 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061122201005.392.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/29946] inept unrolling for small iteration counts In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg01974.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 20:10 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > With the introduction of the new loop unroller in 4.0, > I think you mean 3.4.0 because the new unroller was in 3.4.0. > You're right, it was introduced then. Although the old loop unroller was still present in 3.4.0 and could be selected with a flag - which was useful to get avoid performance regressions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29946