From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21090 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2006 16:49:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 21028 invoked by uid 48); 27 Nov 2006 16:49:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061127164922.21027.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/25620] Missed optimization with power In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg02356.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #16 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-11-27 16:49 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Fixed (partly) on the mainline. We can now expand pow (x, n/2) and pow (x, > n/3) > properly using sqrt and/or cbrt, but cbrt is not available from the fortran > frontend (it misses to define __builtin_cbrt). > Thanks Richard, for this patch, and your other efforts to improve performance for number crunching applications... hopefully the fortran frontend will be fixed as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25620