public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/29993] typdef declaration of cv-qualified function in class
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061130032500.32679.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29993-10812@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2006-11-30 03:24 -------
Confirmed. PR 6628 is indeed fixed, but it appears as if it only has an effect
for typedefs outside class declarations:
---------------------
typedef int ptr1() const; // no error

void foo ()
{
  typedef int ptr2() const; // no error
}

class C
{
    typedef int ptr3() const;  // error

    void bar ()
      {
        typedef int ptr4() const; // no error
      }  
};
-------------------------

g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-4.2-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
x.cc:10: error: &#8216;const&#8217; and &#8216;volatile&#8217; function
specifiers on &#8216;ptr3&#8217; invalid in type declaration

It appears as if Doug's fix for PR 6628 isn't quite complete...

W.


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bangerth at dealii dot org,
                   |                            |dgregor at cs dot indiana
                   |                            |dot edu
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-11-30 03:24:59
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-30  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-27 10:35 [Bug c++/29993] New: " s__nakayama at infoseek dot jp
2006-11-27 17:17 ` [Bug c++/29993] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-30  3:25 ` bangerth at dealii dot org [this message]
2007-01-29 13:50 ` doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
2007-02-27 14:20 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-03-28 12:32 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-28 14:28 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061130032500.32679.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).