From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19279 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2006 13:16:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19221 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2006 13:16:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061201131633.19220.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 13:16 ------- Created an attachment (id=12722) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12722&action=view) This patch fixes the testcase of #6 and regtests on Cygwin_NT/PIV Joost, I am not sure that I see how the test case in #6 can ever have worked; if it is indeed representative of the code in CP2K, I do not see how that can have worked either. I have been back through the diffs for expr (find_array_section) since I wrote it to fix PR16206 - it has had this error in it from the start. The bright side is that it is a one liner:-) Are you in a position to try the patch on CP2K? Regards Paul PS I should thank you; your PRs have given me something absorbing to do during what turned out to be a personally difficult year or so! -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975