From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20403 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2006 19:41:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 20309 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2006 19:41:37 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061203194137.20308.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #19 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-12-03 19:41 ------- Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K Tobias, > Note that this does not fix everything as gfortran rejects also interface_y.f90 > if I comment the "call bl_copy(1.0, chr)"; if I understand the standard > correctly, the ambiguity is ok as long as one does not try to access bl_copy. > (And ifort/NAG f95 and sunf95 agree with me.) > Do you think that the error in gfortran.dg/interface_1.f90 is correct? I have fix for the above that also stops the doubling of the error message. However, it breaks interface_1.f90 because there is no refernce to the generic interface 'ambiguous' and so, no error. Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975