From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10789 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2006 16:12:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10714 invoked by uid 48); 5 Dec 2006 16:12:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061205161203.10713.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/28690] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Performace problem with indexed load/stores on powerpc In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #32 from pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2006-12-05 16:12 ------- Another example, pared down from ammp benchmark in cpu2000. void f2(int *, int *); void mm_fv_update_nonbon(void) { int j, nx; int naybor[27]; f2(naybor, &nx); for(j=0; j< 27; j++) if( naybor[j]) break; /* Indexed load problem */ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28690